Scouts of America: A Wrongheaded Decision

When the Boy Scouts of America opted to include girls and changed their name to Scouts of America/BSA, a few tectonic cultural plates shifted.  The Boy Scout movement began in the United States in 1909 and was incorporated in 1910. The movement soon spread throughout the country. The Girl Scout movement began in 1911 with a group of 19 girls.  It also spread quickly throughout the country.

Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts helped generations of girls and boys define and redefine what it means to grow up with integrity, courage and character.  Each organization has a (mostly) noble history.  Recent sex abuse scandals and leadership conflicts about homosexual participants and leaders in the Boy Scouts has rocked that history.

I can’t help but wonder if some of the decision to admit girls is connected.  Boy Scouts suffered a pretty severe black eye in the public eye as these scandals came to light. Might this be a hopeful action to increase membership, a way of redeeming themselves in the eyes of the public?

Both Scouting organizations have dwindling memberships because of competition from other organizations, school sports, theme-based camps for just about everything, and a host of other things.   Still, it’s not clear that making the Boy Scouts into Scouts of America  and going co-ed is the answer.

Where it really goes off the rails is at the intersection of contemporary gender roles and missed opportunities.  Boys need places where they can be formed into young men with character and integrity.  Historically, Scouting has been such a place.  The Eagle Scouts I know are fine young men who do not follow mainstream culture and live by the Scout’s code.

Similarly, girls need places where they can be formed into strong young women with integrity. In a culture that objectifies women’s bodies, girls need a safe place to develop strength of character in order to not buy into that culture.  The Silver Bar, the Girls Scout equivalent of the Eagle Scout award celebrates young girls who become strong young women who are self-assured, self-identified and resistant to our often morally bankrupt culture.

When girls and boys are put together in scouting, some of the same gender roles they face in school are reinforced.  The “cute” girls and “cute” boys may well act out of their awakening hormones while socially awkward or differently-abled boys and girls are left on the same sidelines they are at school. 

Finally, the perspective of a friend who has been involved with Girl Scouts her whole life, sees the loss of gender-based scouting as the loss of a safe place for boys and girls to fail.  With the addition of gender dynamics failure takes on a new meaning, as does competition. It undercuts the spirit of collaboration and cooperation that includes everyone, even the socially awkward, differently-abled girls and boys.  Being together, girls with girls and boys with boys, levels the playing field and takes gender-based competition out of the equation.

In a time when gender specificity in youth organizations can be a great aid to development of self, androgenic Scouting is a lose/lose.

 

 

3 thoughts on “Scouts of America: A Wrongheaded Decision”

  1. Nice work Pat. Your posts are journalistic direct and straightforward. All thee so far are great and thought provoking. Today I thought about how non- athletic boys were alienated in my childhood.
    Love,
    Grant

    Sent from my iPhone

    Liked by 1 person

  2. What’s with the “B” in the name??? Does this mean that the boys get specific recognition as part of “Scouts of America”? Didn’t they have room for a “G” somewhere in the title? Looks to me like a continuation of the same old win/lose situation where the “B’s” win again.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Love the blog! Lea

    On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:32 AM, The Irreverent Reverend wrote:

    > Pat Liberty posted: “When the Boy Scouts of America opted to include girls > and changed their name to Scouts of America/BSA, a few tectonic cultural > plates shifted. The Boy Scout movement began in the United States in 1909 > and was incorporated in 1910. The movement soon sprea” >

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s