At the time of this writing the National Guard is flooding Washington, DC and supplanting the authority of local law enforcement. This is happening at the direction of the occupant. There is so much wrong with this action that it is hard to know where to start.
First, a few facts. In 2024 violent crime was trending down in all areas. According to the statistics of the Washington, DC police department, violent crime saw a 35% decrease in 2024. The number of homicides also decreased from 64 to 48 in 2024. Carjackings have also seen a significant decline compared to six consecutive years of increases. The number of carjackings was 498, nearly half of the average of the preceding six years.
In other words, the facts don’t match the actions. This is nothing new for the occupant. He regularly disregards the facts and the constitution to continue his unlawful and outrageous power grabs. He invoked the Home Rule Act to take federal control of the city.
The Home Rule Act is different from Martial Law but is a stop on the same train. According to Time Magazine, “…the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, gives the President of the United States the authority to commandeer DC’s Police department in ‘conditions of an emergency nature.’ Attorney General Pam Bondi is now in charge of the Metropolitan Police Department, he said.” Now there is a truly terrifying fact. Pam Bondi would fail at being in charge of a one car funeral.
The Home Rule act grants a municipality a degree of self-governance and autonomy within the state’s legal framework. Martial law, on the other hand, is the imposition of military rule over a civilian population, typically in times of emergency or crisis, and involves the suspension of normal civil law and governance. It is unclear what the limits of the National Guard will be in DC and whether local law enforcement will retain any authority. Under the Home Rule Act, local control is balanced with federal oversight. This does not match the rhetoric of the occupant.
As if this is not enough to cause outrage, the occupant is talking about expanding the National Guard (and perhaps military) to cities like Los Angeles, Baltimore and Oakland (Time Magazine). It appears to be only a matter of time before the occupant begins declaring Martial Law in specific locales with an eye toward expansion into significant geographic regions, if not the whole country.
Martial law replaces civilian authority with military authority. It is declared in times of war, rebellion or national disaster. Washington, DC does not meet the criteria. Martial Law is declared when civilian authority has ceased to function, is completely absent, or is completely ineffective (Office of Justice Programs, USDOJ). Again, Washington DC does not meet any of these criteria. Martial Law cannot be used as long as civilian authority continues to function. The function and limit of authority of the National Guard in Washington, DC is unclear. It appears to be a smash up between Martial Law and the Home Rule Act.
In New Testament times, the issue of human rights was defined by whether or not someone was a Roman citizen. Roman citizens had special status and were protected from scourging, crucifixion, having their land seized or being sold into slavery. Jews had no such protection. They were largely left alone as long as they paid their taxes and knuckled under to the general agenda of Roman rule. They got into trouble, however, because they refused to bow to Ceaser as a God or worship any other Roman official. This was considered treason and Jews were punished by the forfeiture of their land, scourged, crucified or sold into slavery.
It is an example (one of many throughout history) of peoples being marginalized because they do not belong to an occupying force, or refused to obey an occupying force. The suspension or eradication of individual rights and personal autonomy are similar. The concept of human rights and social justice in our time, however, is not mirrored in biblical times. That said, it is important to note that only 5-10% of people in the Roman Empire were Roman Citizens. That means that the majority of the population was subject to the whims of Roman Rule and Roman Law, which clearly favored its own citizens. What is similar from Roman times to ours is the usurping of personal agency to an occupying force.
Jesus’ response to Roman authority often got him into trouble. He refused to bow to any Roman God. He regularly disobeyed Roman rule if it conflicted with the rule of Yahweh and held himself and his followers to higher standards. He was ultimately crucified under Pontius Pilate because he posed a threat to the Roman political system. Throughout the Roman empire the voices of dissent were silenced, often by brutal force or death. Still, Jesus and his followers held to the vision of the Realm of God. Jesus viewed Roman authority as second to the authority of God who desired peace, justice and shalom for all people.
The time is now to make our ultimate loyalty known and to stand against the rising tide of fascism and the erosion of human rights.