Month: April 2025

It’s Not What You Think

Pat Liberty

The Easter sermon from Ledyard Congregational Church, Ledyard, CT

Though the details vary from Gospel to Gospel, it is clear that women were the first witnesses to the resurrection.  And it’s not what you think.  Unlike other religious leaders of the time, Jesus had women in his intimate circle.  They are hidden in the stories, often without names but they are there. But here, Mary is named and known. History has made Mary Magdalene an unsavory woman, but there is not a shred of historic evidence to suggest that this is true. Recent archaeological evidence suggests that Magdala may not even have been a real place. The name will probably stick, because calling her the “other Mary” doesn’t seem all that helpful, but it would be good if she lost the undeserved reputation.

The Easter event, however we understand it, begins in darkness. Before the sun started to tug at the edge of night, a time so quiet you could hear the trees breathe, that is where Easter begins. But the darkness was more than the absence of light. It was also the presence of fear, bewilderment, and a deep sense of uncertainty. Frederick Buechner called it “the darkness of the resurrection itself, that morning when it was hard to be sure what you were seeing.” Was it really an angel sitting in the unlit tomb? Were those shadows in the corner really grave clothes? The quiet stranger lingering outside, who seemed somehow vaguely familiar.

“Early in the morning, while it was still dark” is where Easter begins– with a sense of being lost and a profound absence of certainty. The earliest followers of Jesus had left home and life and family for the sake of this rabbi… and now it seemed it was all for naught. They stumbled around confused and afraid in the half light on that third day after Jesus’ crucifixion.  

I find that hopeful, because most of the time I don’t have it, whatever “it” happens to be all figured out. And for over 2000 years people have been trying to codify, explain and expound on the Easter event. And 2000 years later “it” has not been all figured out.

All the celebration and trumpets and flowers and alleluias came a few hundred years later. The first Easter was very tentative.

Mary Magdalene’s journey to the tomb was rooted in sadness but in her going to the grave, at great risk to herself, she also bore witness to Jesus’ teaching that love is stronger than death, and perfect love casts out fear. And perfect love is not love without error; it is love that trusts its source.  Mary’s love for Jesus was greater than her fear of what might happen to her if she trusted her heart. It is often in such heartbreak that resurrection begins.

And the Easter moment comes for her when she recognizes Jesus; there are few details given in any of the gospel accounts.  We are given just enough to discern a truth, even though it is not a logical event.

It is a consequence of modernity that we think in linear terms, the dawn of movies and other recording equipment has changed how we understand reality.  The resurrection stories, THIS resurrection story is not intended to be a movie script.  The truth of the story goes beyond the words recorded and it’s not what we think. 

Any way you look at it, that is a mighty fragile beginning for a religion that has lasted over 2000 years now, and yet that is where so many of us continue to focus our energy: on that tomb, on that morning, on what did or did not happen there and how to explain it to anyone who does not happen to believe it too.

Resurrection does not square with anything else we know about physical human life on earth. No one has ever seen it happen, which is why it helps me to remember that no one saw it happen on Easter morning either.

Barbara Brown Taylor wrote; “The resurrection is the one and only event in Jesus’ life that was entirely between him and God. There were no witnesses whatsoever. No one on earth can say what happened inside that tomb, because no one was there. They all arrived after the fact. Two of them saw clothes. One of them saw angels. Most of them saw nothing at all because they were still in bed that morning, but as it turned out that did not matter because the empty tomb was not the point.”

The point is that somewhere along the line they recognized him in the faces of those he loved when he walked this earth.  They recognized him in each other’s eyes when they spoke the words he gave them, when they remembered that following Jesus on the way was the only thing that mattered, and that Jesus was the way and showed the way.

The resurrection became real in a different way for all of them. God used the stuff of their lives as the raw material in which to make the resurrection real. 

John Shelby Spong, the late bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey, suggests in his book, The Easter Moment, that it was the remembering and the telling, the scared and sacred sharing that transformed this group of confused fisher folk into a mighty witness to an even mightier truth. They recognized the risen Christ in their midst, were strengthened by sharing a meal in his name. 

And IN TIME they found their voices and their courage and carried on.  The truth of the empty tomb became real when God’s loving power was felt in their hearts and in their gathering. 

They heard the words and followed the simple directions from the angel, but it didn’t become real until they had some time to sit with it. 

We hear the words and understand them, but Easter does not become real until our own lives are transformed by it. 

Easter is always a moment that changes all other moments.

We don’t think too much about eternal life until someone we love dies.  We don’t think much about the promise of God’s sustaining love until we are ill and think we might die.   We may not think much about hope until it eludes us; we may not think much about joy until it returns to us on the heels of despair. 

The promise becomes real in the stuff of our own lives.  And it happens again and again as the stuff changes. 

Albert Schweitzer wrote, “To those who would follow the risen Christ, whether wise or simple, he will reveal himself in the conflicts and the sufferings which they shall pass through in his fellowship.  And as an ineffable mystery they shall learn in their own experience who he is.” 

But Easter is never just about us…it’s also about the passions at work in Jesus’ earthly life…his love for those no one else paid any attention to; his willingness to speak truth to power and lay bare the corruption that masqueraded as faithfulness.  Jesus was all about an upside-down realm where the last were first and the first were last.

Resurrection is at once deeply personal and totally communal…as we mark the Easter holiday as a point in time…it is not the anniversary of an event…it is the reminder of new life born of discipleship and community.

The resurrection stories are a mix and mess of mystery and human bewilderment, and we do well to remember it is not the empty tomb that made believers of them.  It was their fellowship with one another, their shared doubt and shared faith…it was their growing awareness of his presence as they lived the life he showed them.

And so for us…Christ is present in our fragmented lives…calling us to wholeness.

Christ is present in our sadness and grief, unfolding a way to healing.

Christ is present in the midst of all that comes to an end, with a promise of presence and unfailing love

Christ is present n the struggle for peace, going on ahead of us to show the way.

Christ is present in the yearning for justice, calling us to repentance and lives made new.

Christ is present in our fear of death, calling us to the hope of eternal life in Jesus Christ

Christ is present in our fear of life, saying follow me.

Word Scrubbing: An Exercise in Making People Invisible

Pat Liberty

Word scrubbing is the practice of erasing language that points to particular people or things. Word scrubbing makes a whole list of vulnerable people invisible. According to Elizabeth Power, M.Ed., Adjunct Instructor, Georgetown University Medical Center and founder of The Trauma Informed Academy, the following are words that can trigger additional scrutiny in a grant application or request for program funding from the Federal Government:

  • Activist, activism, advocate, advocacy, background, barrier, barriers, biased, bias, BIPOC, Black and Latinx
  • Community diversity, community equity, cultural differences, cultural heritage, culturally responsive
  • Disabilities, discrimination, discriminatory, diversified, diversity
  • Enhancing, equality, equal opportunity, equitable, ethnicity, excluded
  • Female, fostering, gender, groups, hate speech, Hispanic minority, historically, implicit bias
  • Inclusion, inclusive, increase, indigenous community, inequalities, inequity, institutional
  • Justice, LGBTQ, marginalize, minorities, multicultural, polarization, political, privilege, prejudice, promoting
  • Race, racial, sense of belonging, sexual preferences, social justice, sociocultural, socioeconomic, status, status, stereotype
  • Trauma, underappreciated, underrepresented, underserved, victims, women

This list includes most of the people Jesus spent his life reaching out to, loving and ministering to.

Jesus fed the hungry, made the blind see, cared for the poor and included everyone in the circle of God’s concern and love.

By removing these words from the lexicon of public programming and grant funding, the populations represented behind these words are essentially removed from public view. They are “disappeared” like political dissidents in authoritarian regimes. It also ensures that these populations will continue to be underserved and underrepresented in the public arena.

By erasing these words, the US is rewinding the clock at least 50 years to a time when the differently abled, wounded, gender divergent, and abused, to name just a few, were routinely excluded from resources, programs and funding that helped heal and empower them. Removing funding for these groups also isolates them from the mainstream of human life by taking away resources they need to function in society.

Many of Jesus’ miracles were as much about restoring people to their community as they were about healing physical maladies. For instance, in biblical times, women who were menstruating were considered ritually unclean and had to absent themselves from their community. In the story from Luke 8, a woman with an issue of blood was perpetually isolated from her community. When she was healed, not only was her physical health restored, she also was able to rejoin her community.

This word scrubbing policy directive in our time is a move toward a historically unkind and limiting time in the lives of many people. It is despicable that this is now public policy for funding initiatives. It begs the question, what kind of programs will be funded? Summer camp for blond hair, blued eyed rich kids from the suburbs? Private limo transportation for Buffy and Muffy to their piano lessons?

It is yet another of the occupant and his cronies’ fly by night slash and burn public policy initiatives that stay under the radar.  If the day’s news hasn’t given you reason to contact your legislators, this is it. If we stay silent, the populations that are being “disappeared” don’t have a chance.

The Changing Face of Education

Pat Liberty

Last week the occupant signed an executive order to begin dismantling the Department of Education. Ultimately the Department can only be abolished by Congress, but with a Republican majority in the House and Senate this should not be a problem.

What is a problem, however, is the implications of this action. The occupant is moving to privatize education through block grants given directly to states. States already control a majority of the money that funds education, so his stated reason for dismantling the department is disingenuous at best.

Federal dollars are approved by Congress and given to the Department of Education to allocate to states. Giving the money to states as block grants means that parents could use vouchers to send their children to private schools. As Project 2025 states, parents should have the authority to determine how their children are educated. Translation: parents can use public monies to send their children to private school.

In the current system, federal funds are primarily used to support underperforming schools and offer additional resources for poor children. Children with disabilities, 95% of whom are educated in public schools, will have less access to adequate education that accommodates their disabilities. Block grants that allow parents to purchase vouchers means that public schools, especially those in low-income communities will have fewer resources.

The Department of Education champions enforcing federal statutes prohibiting discrimination in education and assuring that every student has access to an education that will help them reach their potential. Dismantling the department means defunding programs that feed, educate, and protect vulnerable and underserved students.

According to the National Education Association (NEA), eliminating programs like Title 1 will divert money from schools with high concentrations of students living in poverty. Support such as reading specialists and smaller class sizes would be eliminated. Reading scores nationally are falling. According to the National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP), national reading scores declined for both fourth and eighth grade students. Reading scores fell to a record low in 2019 and 2022. A record number of students performed below basic reading competency.  Eliminating reading specialists seems ill advised at best. According to an analysis by the Center for American Progress, 180,000 teaching positions could be lost, affecting 2.8 million students in low-income communities.

It is likely that the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights will be moved to the Department of Justice. This would practically eliminate the Office’s capacity to protect students against discrimination based on gender, race and disability. The absence of strong federal oversight would leave millions of students vulnerable to discrimination.

Under this cockamamie plan the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) would be transferred to another agency, as yet undefined. Over 7.5 million students, or 15% of the student population, receive special education services. Administering funds as block grants to states is unlikely to result in funding special education programs. The public schools that will get the left-overs after parents purchase their private school vouchers will have inadequate resources to fulfill the Individual Education Plans (IEP’s) that many students have to accommodate their learning disabilities.  

The overall goal is to privatize education which will leave the poorest and most vulnerable students, especially those with special needs, in underperforming public schools. The whole of Project 2025 is geared toward victimizing our most vulnerable populations. The Department of Education is just the latest casualty assuring that those in greatest need will get the fewest resources.

The Department of Education is four percent of the entire national budget. Surely eliminating four percent of the budget does nothing to address the national deficit, but it consigns thousands of children to inadequate education that will allow them to function in the future.

Assuring that every child gets an education is a foundation of a stable society. Students that are unable to read or function in the work-a-day world will be trapped in low-wage jobs that will continue the cycle of poverty. How this claims to have Christian values is mind-boggling. Jesus railed against unjust social and political systems that trapped people in poverty. Dismantling the Department of Education is just the latest casualty in Trump’s misguided plan to victimize the poor and under-resource those in most need.